Interview pre-work · Specialist, Professional Learning T2

Designing the Conditions Where Learning Becomes Practice.

A professional learning support plan for Fort Bend ISD - built to shift leaders from arranging sessions to designing, modeling, following through, and learning alongside teachers.

06
connected components
04
observable leader shifts
01
year to build the cycle
THE LEARNING SYSTEMONE CYCLE, NOT SIX INITIATIVES
Practicechanges
  1. 01Yearlong campus plan
  2. 02Design review
  3. 03Delivery rehearsal
  4. 04Leader follow-through
  5. 05Campus lead network
  6. 06Evidence + refinement

Evidence shapes the plan. Review and rehearsal protect quality. Leader follow-through supports transfer. The next plan begins with what the system learned.

01 · Read the signal

The audit points in one direction.

“Teachers just need fun sessions” is not a reason to work around leaders. It is evidence that the leadership practices surrounding professional learning are the thing to change.

01

Fragmented

Campus-led learning varies widely.

02

Event-based

One-off workshops stand in for a system.

03

Under-supported

Teachers receive limited feedback and coaching.

04

Leader-owned

The leadership practices around learning must change.

02 · Build the system

Six structures. One promise.

This plan does not add sessions. It changes how professional learning is designed, delivered, supported, and studied on every campus - and asks leaders to move through those structures first.

01

Yearlong campus plan

One evidence-based plan per campus, co-built with the principal and reviewed twice a year.

PRODUCESA shared direction
02

Design review

A Brain Trust strengthens the need, outcomes, adult-learning design, and follow-through while revision is still possible.

PRODUCESDocumented revisions
03

Delivery rehearsal

A Demo Day tests facilitation, pacing, directions, technology, and the real participant experience before launch.

PRODUCESDelivery readiness
04

Leader follow-through

Walkthroughs, written instructional feedback, and PLC follow-up turn a session into a supported practice.

PRODUCESPractice in motion
05

Campus lead network

Monthly development builds a facilitator and reviewer pool so campuses can run the process without OD in every room.

PRODUCESDistributed capacity
06

Evidence + refinement

Twice-yearly reviews determine what should be repeated, revised, extended, or retired.

PRODUCESA learning system
01Evidence
02Design
03Review
04Rehearse
05Deliver
06Support
07Study
08Refine

03 · Change the practice

Leadership shifts you can observe.

The goal is not agreement with a new idea. The goal is a small set of leader behaviors that teachers can feel and evidence can reveal.

01

Schedule professional learning

Design it from evidence

Name the practice, the evidence, and the observable behavior change before choosing a topic or presenter.

02

Deliver a session and move on

Own the follow-through cycle

Attach walkthroughs, feedback, PLC follow-up, and a responsible person to every substantial learning experience.

03

Give infrequent, evaluative feedback

Give specific, instructional feedback

Practice with video, peer review, and real feedback artifacts until the new behavior is routine.

04

Exempt leaders from the process

Model the practice they require

OD and principals go through design review and rehearsal as presenters before setting a campus-wide expectation.

THE ROLE CHANGE

Professional learning moves from something leaders arrange for teachers to something leaders participate in, design carefully, and follow through on.

04 · Make it real

One year. Four deliberate phases.

Begin with evidence and volunteers. Build capacity before expanding. Use year-one evidence - not a fresh survey - to design year two.

1

Phase 1 · June - August

Ground the work in evidence

Build the tools, co-design campus plans, and recruit 8-10 volunteer pilot campuses.

MILESTONE

Every campus names one or two target practices and a follow-through cycle.

2

Phase 2 · September - December

Pilot and build capacity

Train facilitators, launch the Campus Professional Learning Lead Network, and begin the leadership feedback sequence.

MILESTONE

Pilot campuses complete two full design-and-rehearsal cycles.

3

Phase 3 · January - May

Expand

Extend the expectations districtwide and embed review dates when sessions are scheduled.

MILESTONE

All campuses use the process; walkthrough and feedback frequency are measured.

4

Phase 4 · May - August

Study and sustain

Review process, quality, and impact evidence; revise the tools; strengthen the facilitator pipeline.

MILESTONE

Year two plans are built from year one results.

05 · Know what changed

Measure the system at three levels.

Satisfaction tells us whether people enjoyed a session. It does not tell us whether practice changed.

01

Process

Are the structures being used?

Current campus plans, completed reviews, walkthrough and feedback frequency

02

Quality

Did the learning improve?

Relevance, clarity, practice time, design consistency, facilitator readiness

03

Impact

Did practice change?

Walkthrough evidence, teacher reports, movement on the campus improvement goal

06 · See the tools

Two protocols protect quality.

Brain Trusts improve the design. Demo Days improve the delivery. Reviewing only one leaves half the quality question unexamined.

01Design review
Cover of the Brain Trust Protocol

Design review

Brain Trust Protocol

A structured, collaborative review while a professional learning session is still in draft. It protects quality at the moment the need, outcomes, practice, and follow-through are decided.

  • Three review tiers scaled to reach and stakes
  • 45- and 60-minute meeting protocols
  • Feedback categories, readiness language, and forms
  • Worked example and four-phase implementation guidance

Proposed sample for discussion. This does not represent current FBISD policy or approved practice.

02Delivery rehearsal
Cover of the Demo Day Protocol

Delivery rehearsal

Demo Day Protocol

A rehearsal with an authentic audience after design revisions and before delivery. It moves the discovery of unclear directions, weak pacing, and technology failures into a room where they cost nothing.

  • Targeted, standard, and extended rehearsal formats
  • Observation rubric grounded in participant experience
  • Psychological-safety guardrails and readiness language
  • Forms, worked example, and a pause-and-retry option

Proposed sample for discussion. This does not represent current FBISD policy or approved practice.

The complete written response

Professional Learning Support Plan

Seven pages connecting the audit, six-component system, leader behavior change, implementation roadmap, measures, assumptions, and companion protocols.

Original task materials

The plan responds to the published role and the learning-system design task provided for the interview.

View job description

Your browser cannot display the embedded PDF. Open the plan instead.

About Caitlin

Systems thinker · Facilitator · Learning designer

I build systems leaders can eventually run without me in the room.

I am an organizational learning leader who turns evidence into usable structures: facilitation protocols, leadership routines, coaching cycles, and measures that make transfer visible. My work is grounded in adult learning, psychological safety, and the belief that leaders should model the practices they ask of others.